1-year peak   2-year peak   3-year peak   4-year peak   5-year peak   10-year peak   15-year peak   20-year peak    Find a player
Chessmetrics Player Profile: Mir Sultan Khan
   Born:    1905-Jan
   Died:    1966-Apr
   Best World Rank:    #6 (on the May 1933 rating list)
   Highest Rating:    2699 on the November 1932 rating list, #7 in world, age 27y10m
   Best Individual Performance:    2713 in Prague ol (Men), 1931, scoring 7.5/11 (68%) vs 2631-rated opposition

  Graph   Best Performances   Career Details   Event Details   Ratings only
    Event Name  Rating   Performance   Overall Results   Actual Results vs Rated Opponents   +/- Predicted 
    Liege, 1930  not rated on January 1930 list   2625   +2 (6.5/11, 59%)   +1 (5.5/10, 55%) vs 2612-rated opposition   N/A 
    Scarborough, 1930  not rated on January 1930 list   2615   +2 (6.5/11, 59%)   +2 (6.5/11, 59%) vs 2570-rated opposition   N/A 
    Hamburg ol (Men), 1930  2599 (#21 on July 1930 list  [2437]   -2 (1.5/5, 30%)   -3 (0.5/4, 13%) vs 2589-rated opposition   -1.5 
    Hastings, 1930  2586 (#25 on December 1930 list  2661   +3 (6/9, 67%)   +3 (5.5/8, 69%) vs 2591-rated opposition   +1.5 
    Sultan Khan-Tartakower Match (Semmering), 1931  2621 (#15 on January 1931 list  2696   +1 (6.5/12, 54%)   +1 (6.5/12, 54%) vs 2693-rated opposition   +1.5 

    Prague ol (Men), 1931  2633 (#14 on July 1931 list  2713   +7 (10.5/14, 75%)   +4 (7.5/11, 68%) vs 2631-rated opposition   +2.0 
    Hastings, 1931  2678 (#8 on December 1931 list  2561   = (4.5/9, 50%)   -1 (3.5/8, 44%) vs 2607-rated opposition   -1.2 
    London (BCF Championship), 1932  2666 (#10 on January 1932 list  2613   +6 (8.5/11, 77%)   +3 (4/5, 80%) vs 2519-rated opposition   +0.6 
    Bern, 1932  2666 (#10 on January 1932 list  2599   +7 (11/15, 73%)   = (3/6, 50%) vs 2633-rated opposition   -0.2 
    London, 1932  2667 (#10 on February 1932 list  2668   +4 (7.5/11, 68%)   +2 (5/8, 63%) vs 2635-rated opposition   +0.7 

    Flohr-Sultan Khan Match (London), 1932  2667 (#10 on February 1932 list  2607   -1 (2.5/6, 42%)   -1 (2.5/6, 42%) vs 2686-rated opposition   -0.4 
    Cambridge, 1932  2679 (#8 on March 1932 list  2592   +4 (5.5/7, 79%)   +3 (4.5/6, 75%) vs 2496-rated opposition   +0.2 
    Hastings, 1932  2697 (#7 on December 1932 list  2607   +2 (5.5/9, 61%)   +2 (5.5/9, 61%) vs 2559-rated opposition   -0.5 
    Folkestone ol (Men), 1933  2692 (#7 on June 1933 list  2569   = (7/14, 50%)   -1 (5.5/12, 46%) vs 2595-rated opposition   -1.9