1-year peak   2-year peak   3-year peak   4-year peak   5-year peak   10-year peak   15-year peak   20-year peak    Find a player
Chessmetrics Player Profile: Emanuel Lasker
   Born:    1868-Dec
   Died:    1941-Jan
   Best World Rank:    #1 (292 different months between the June 1890 rating list and the December 1926 rating list )
   Highest Rating:    2878 on the May 1894 rating list, #1 in world, age 25y5m
   Best Individual Performance:    2882 in Lasker-Steinitz II (World Championship, Moscow), 1896, scoring 12.5/17 (74%) vs 2754-rated opposition

  Graph   Best Performances   Career Details   Event Details   Ratings only
     Career performances of 2800-2899:   
        2882 in Lasker-Steinitz II (World Championship, Moscow), 1896, scoring 12.5/17 (74%) vs 2754-rated opposition
        2878 in London, 1899, scoring 18/22 (82%) vs 2667-rated opposition
        2876 in Lasker-Marshall I (World Championship, USA), 1907, scoring 11.5/15 (77%) vs 2738-rated opposition
        2853 in St. Petersburg, 1914, scoring 11.5/16 (72%) vs 2738-rated opposition
        2833 in Paris, 1900, scoring 11.5/14 (82%) vs 2660-rated opposition
        2829 in St. Petersburg, 1895, scoring 11.5/18 (64%) vs 2755-rated opposition
        2828 in New York, 1924, scoring 14/18 (78%) vs 2658-rated opposition
        2825 in Nurnberg, 1896, scoring 11/14 (79%) vs 2673-rated opposition
        2821 in Janowsky-Lasker IV (World Championship, Berlin), 1910, scoring 9.5/11 (86%) vs 2647-rated opposition
        2816 in Lasker-Tarrasch II (Berlin), 1916, scoring 5.5/6 (92%) vs 2703-rated opposition
        2815 in St. Petersburg, 1909, scoring 12.5/16 (78%) vs 2651-rated opposition
        2802 in Lasker-Steinitz I (World Championship, USA/CAN), 1894, scoring 12/19 (63%) vs 2726-rated opposition
     Career performances of 2700-2799:   
        2799 in Lasker-Tarrasch I (World Championship, Germany), 1908, scoring 10.5/16 (66%) vs 2718-rated opposition
        2794 in Blackburne-Lasker Match (London), 1892, scoring 8/10 (80%) vs 2665-rated opposition
        2790 in Janowsky-Lasker III (Paris), 1909, scoring 8/10 (80%) vs 2661-rated opposition
        2770 in Lasker-Mieses Match (Leipzig), 1890, scoring 6.5/8 (81%) vs 2657-rated opposition
        2767 in New York, 1893, scoring 10/10 (100%) vs 2512-rated opposition
        2765 in London, 1892, scoring 6.5/8 (81%) vs 2651-rated opposition
        2757 in Hastings, 1895, scoring 11.5/17 (68%) vs 2652-rated opposition
        2756 in Maehrisch Ostrau, 1923, scoring 8.5/11 (77%) vs 2626-rated opposition
        2748 in Cambridge Springs, 1904, scoring 6/9 (67%) vs 2700-rated opposition
        2747 in Bird-Lasker II (Newcastle), 1892, scoring 5/5 (100%) vs 2603-rated opposition
        2737 in Moscow, 1925, scoring 9.5/14 (68%) vs 2642-rated opposition
        2709 in Capablanca-Lasker Match (World Championship, Havana), 1921, scoring 5/14 (36%) vs 2822-rated opposition
        2707 in Moscow, 1935, scoring 5.5/8 (69%) vs 2649-rated opposition