Summary: 1893 - 1898

How to use this page

Duration: All years 20th century 19th century 50-year span 40-year span 30-year span 20-year span 10-year span 5-year span 3-year span 1-year span covering 2000-Jan through 2004-Dec 1999-Jan through 2003-Dec 1998-Jan through 2002-Dec 1997-Jan through 2001-Dec 1996-Jan through 2000-Dec 1995-Jan through 1999-Dec 1994-Jan through 1998-Dec 1993-Jan through 1997-Dec 1992-Jan through 1996-Dec 1991-Jan through 1995-Dec 1990-Jan through 1994-Dec 1989-Jan through 1993-Dec 1988-Jan through 1992-Dec 1987-Jan through 1991-Dec 1986-Jan through 1990-Dec 1985-Jan through 1989-Dec 1984-Jan through 1988-Dec 1983-Jan through 1987-Dec 1982-Jan through 1986-Dec 1981-Jan through 1985-Dec 1980-Jan through 1984-Dec 1979-Jan through 1983-Dec 1978-Jan through 1982-Dec 1977-Jan through 1981-Dec 1976-Jan through 1980-Dec 1975-Jan through 1979-Dec 1974-Jan through 1978-Dec 1973-Jan through 1977-Dec 1972-Jan through 1976-Dec 1971-Jan through 1975-Dec 1970-Jan through 1974-Dec 1969-Jan through 1973-Dec 1968-Jan through 1972-Dec 1967-Jan through 1971-Dec 1966-Jan through 1970-Dec 1965-Jan through 1969-Dec 1964-Jan through 1968-Dec 1963-Jan through 1967-Dec 1962-Jan through 1966-Dec 1961-Jan through 1965-Dec 1960-Jan through 1964-Dec 1959-Jan through 1963-Dec 1958-Jan through 1962-Dec 1957-Jan through 1961-Dec 1956-Jan through 1960-Dec 1955-Jan through 1959-Dec 1954-Jan through 1958-Dec 1953-Jan through 1957-Dec 1952-Jan through 1956-Dec 1951-Jan through 1955-Dec 1950-Jan through 1954-Dec 1949-Jan through 1953-Dec 1948-Jan through 1952-Dec 1947-Jan through 1951-Dec 1946-Jan through 1950-Dec 1945-Jan through 1949-Dec 1944-Jan through 1948-Dec 1943-Jan through 1947-Dec 1942-Jan through 1946-Dec 1941-Jan through 1945-Dec 1940-Jan through 1944-Dec 1939-Jan through 1943-Dec 1938-Jan through 1942-Dec 1937-Jan through 1941-Dec 1936-Jan through 1940-Dec 1935-Jan through 1939-Dec 1934-Jan through 1938-Dec 1933-Jan through 1937-Dec 1932-Jan through 1936-Dec 1931-Jan through 1935-Dec 1930-Jan through 1934-Dec 1929-Jan through 1933-Dec 1928-Jan through 1932-Dec 1927-Jan through 1931-Dec 1926-Jan through 1930-Dec 1925-Jan through 1929-Dec 1924-Jan through 1928-Dec 1923-Jan through 1927-Dec 1922-Jan through 1926-Dec 1921-Jan through 1925-Dec 1920-Jan through 1924-Dec 1919-Jan through 1923-Dec 1918-Jan through 1922-Dec 1917-Jan through 1921-Dec 1916-Jan through 1920-Dec 1915-Jan through 1919-Dec 1914-Jan through 1918-Dec 1913-Jan through 1917-Dec 1912-Jan through 1916-Dec 1911-Jan through 1915-Dec 1910-Jan through 1914-Dec 1909-Jan through 1913-Dec 1908-Jan through 1912-Dec 1907-Jan through 1911-Dec 1906-Jan through 1910-Dec 1905-Jan through 1909-Dec 1904-Jan through 1908-Dec 1903-Jan through 1907-Dec 1902-Jan through 1906-Dec 1901-Jan through 1905-Dec 1900-Jan through 1904-Dec 1899-Jan through 1903-Dec 1898-Jan through 1902-Dec 1897-Jan through 1901-Dec 1896-Jan through 1900-Dec 1895-Jan through 1899-Dec 1894-Jan through 1898-Dec 1893-Jan through 1897-Dec 1892-Jan through 1896-Dec 1891-Jan through 1895-Dec 1890-Jan through 1894-Dec 1889-Jan through 1893-Dec 1888-Jan through 1892-Dec 1887-Jan through 1891-Dec 1886-Jan through 1890-Dec 1885-Jan through 1889-Dec 1884-Jan through 1888-Dec 1883-Jan through 1887-Dec 1882-Jan through 1886-Dec 1881-Jan through 1885-Dec 1880-Jan through 1884-Dec 1879-Jan through 1883-Dec 1878-Jan through 1882-Dec 1877-Jan through 1881-Dec 1876-Jan through 1880-Dec 1875-Jan through 1879-Dec 1874-Jan through 1878-Dec 1873-Jan through 1877-Dec 1872-Jan through 1876-Dec 1871-Jan through 1875-Dec 1870-Jan through 1874-Dec 1869-Jan through 1873-Dec 1868-Jan through 1872-Dec 1867-Jan through 1871-Dec 1866-Jan through 1870-Dec 1865-Jan through 1869-Dec 1864-Jan through 1868-Dec 1863-Jan through 1867-Dec 1862-Jan through 1866-Dec 1861-Jan through 1865-Dec 1860-Jan through 1864-Dec 1859-Jan through 1863-Dec 1858-Jan through 1862-Dec 1857-Jan through 1861-Dec 1856-Jan through 1860-Dec 1855-Jan through 1859-Dec 1854-Jan through 1858-Dec 1853-Jan through 1857-Dec 1852-Jan through 1856-Dec 1851-Jan through 1855-Dec 1850-Jan through 1854-Dec 1849-Jan through 1853-Dec 1848-Jan through 1852-Dec 1847-Jan through 1851-Dec 1846-Jan through 1850-Dec 1845-Jan through 1849-Dec 1844-Jan through 1848-Dec 1843-Jan through 1847-Dec

Most Dominant Player between 1893 and 1898 See more details    Emanuel Lasker: 5.0 years as #1 (between January 1893 and December 1897) The only player to be ranked #1 between 1893 and 1898 was Emanuel Lasker, with 60 different months as the top-ranked player (a total of 5.0 years). Highest-Rated Player between 1893 and 1898 See more details    Emanuel Lasker: 2878 (May 1894) The player who achieved the highest peak rating between 1893 and 1898 was Emanuel Lasker, with a rating of 2878 on the May 1894 list. The next-highest peak ratings between 1893 and 1898 were achieved by Siegbert Tarrasch (2824 on the June 1895 list) and Mikhail Chigorin (2797 on the October 1895 list). Strongest Tournament between 1893 and 1898 See more details    Hastings, 1895: Class 19 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #6, #7, #8, #9) The strongest tournament held between 1893 and 1898 was Hastings 1895. This was a Class 19 tournament, including eight of the top ten players in the world (from the August 1895 rating list). The next-strongest tournaments were Nurnberg 1896 (Class 17) and St. Petersburg 1895 (Class 12). Strongest Match between 1893 and 1898 See more details    Lasker-Steinitz II (World Championship, Moscow), 1896: #1 vs #4 The strongest match held between 1893 and 1898 was Lasker-Steinitz II (World Championship, Moscow), 1896. This was a matchup of #1 vs #4, including #1 Emanuel Lasker (2842) and #4 Wilhelm Steinitz (2754) from the November 1896 rating list. Next on the list were Lasker-Steinitz I (World Championship, USA/CAN), 1894 (#1 vs #4) and Chigorin-Tarrasch Match (St. Petersburg), 1893 (#2 vs #4). Best Individual Event Performance between 1893 and 1898 Summary only | Top 5 | Top 10 | Top 20 | Top 50 | Top 100    Emanuel Lasker: 2882 in Lasker-Steinitz II (World Championship, Moscow), 1896 The best individual event performance between 1893 and 1898 was achieved by Emanuel Lasker with a Chessmetrics Performance Rating of 2882 in Lasker-Steinitz II (World Championship, Moscow), 1896. The next-best individual event performances were achieved by Siegbert Tarrasch (2853 performance) in Tarrasch-Walbrodt Match (Nuremberg), 1894, and by Emanuel Lasker (2829 performance) in St. Petersburg, 1895.       Player Name       Chessmetrics Performance Rating    Event  #1     Emanuel Lasker       2882 performance: 12.5/17 (74%) vs 2754    Lasker-Steinitz II (World Championship, Moscow), 1896  #2     Siegbert Tarrasch       2853 performance: 7.5/8 (94%) vs 2689    Tarrasch-Walbrodt Match (Nuremberg), 1894  #3     Emanuel Lasker       2829 performance: 11.5/18 (64%) vs 2755    St. Petersburg, 1895  #4     Emanuel Lasker       2825 performance: 11/14 (79%) vs 2673    Nurnberg, 1896  #5     Harry Pillsbury       2805 performance: 12.5/17 (74%) vs 2666    Hastings, 1895  #6     Emanuel Lasker       2802 performance: 12/19 (63%) vs 2726    Lasker-Steinitz I (World Championship, USA/CAN), 1894  #7     Harry Pillsbury       2790 performance: 10/14 (71%) vs 2680    Nurnberg, 1896  #8     Wilhelm Steinitz       2789 performance: 9.5/18 (53%) vs 2787    St. Petersburg, 1895  #9     Mikhail Chigorin       2787 performance: 10/14 (71%) vs 2676    Budapest, 1896  #10     Mikhail Chigorin       2783 performance: 10/14 (71%) vs 2672    Chigorin-Schiffers II (St. Petersburg), 1897  #11     Mikhail Chigorin       2781 performance: 12/17 (71%) vs 2659    Hastings, 1895  #12     Dawid Janowsky       2776 performance: 9.5/14 (68%) vs 2687    Nurnberg, 1896  #13     Rezsö Charousek       2769 performance: 12/16 (75%) vs 2620    Berlin, 1897  #14     Emanuel Lasker       2767 performance: 10/10 (100%) vs 2512    New York, 1893  #15     Siegbert Tarrasch       2767 performance: 9.5/14 (68%) vs 2676    Nurnberg, 1896  #16     Mikhail Chigorin       2764 performance: 11/22 (50%) vs 2770    Chigorin-Tarrasch Match (St. Petersburg), 1893  #17     Emanuel Lasker       2757 performance: 11.5/17 (68%) vs 2652    Hastings, 1895  #18     Géza Maróczy       2752 performance: 9.5/15 (63%) vs 2684    Nurnberg, 1896  #19     Wilhelm Steinitz       2748 performance: 7/19 (37%) vs 2850    Lasker-Steinitz I (World Championship, USA/CAN), 1894  #20     Harry Pillsbury       2744 performance: 8/18 (44%) vs 2794    St. Petersburg, 1895 NOTE: "Chessmetrics Performance Rating" is a Chessmetrics formula used to estimate the performance level of a player, based solely on the evidence of their results in one event. It only considers games against rated opposition, so the above summary excludes any games against unrated opponents.