Summary: 1924 - 1925 How to use this page
Duration: covering
Most Dominant Player between 1924 and 1925 See more details
   Emanuel Lasker: 0.8 years as #1 (between April 1924 and December 1924)
The player who was ranked #1 most often between 1924 and 1925 was Emanuel Lasker, with 9 different months as the top-ranked player. Next on the list was Alexander Alekhine (3 months), the only other player to be ranked #1 between 1924 and 1925.
Highest-Rated Player between 1924 and 1925 See more details
   Emanuel Lasker: 2833 (April 1924)
The player who achieved the highest peak rating between 1924 and 1925 was Emanuel Lasker, with a rating of 2833 on the April 1924 list. The next-highest peak ratings between 1924 and 1925 were achieved by José Capablanca (2824 on the April 1924 list) and Alexander Alekhine (2776 on the February 1924 list).
Strongest Tournament between 1924 and 1925 See more details
   New York, 1924: Class 15 (#1, #2, #3, #7, #8, #9, #10)
The strongest tournament held between 1924 and 1925 was New York 1924. This was a Class 15 tournament, including seven of the top ten players in the world (from the March 1924 rating list). The next-strongest tournaments were Meran 1924 (Class 5) and Berlin 1924 (Class 3).
Strongest Match between 1924 and 1925 See more details
   Colle-Euwe I (Zutphen), 1924: #15 vs #20
The strongest match held between 1924 and 1925 was Colle-Euwe I (Zutphen), 1924. This was a matchup of #15 vs #20, including #15 Max Euwe (2608) and #20 Edgar Colle (2595) from the January 1924 rating list. Next on the list were Becker-Wagner Match (Hamburg), 1924 (#31 vs #45) and Davidson-Euwe I (Amsterdam), 1924 (#15 vs #70).
Best Individual Event Performance between 1924 and 1925 Summary only | Top 5 | Top 10 | Top 20 | Top 50 | Top 100
   Emanuel Lasker: 2828 in New York, 1924
The best individual event performance between 1924 and 1925 was achieved by Emanuel Lasker with a Chessmetrics Performance Rating of 2828 in New York, 1924. The next-best individual event performances were achieved by José Capablanca (2792 performance) in New York, 1924, and by Alexander Alekhine (2689 performance) in New York, 1924.
      Player Name       Chessmetrics Performance Rating    Event
 #1    Emanuel Lasker      2828 performance: 14/18 (78%) vs 2658   New York, 1924
 #2    José Capablanca      2792 performance: 13/18 (72%) vs 2655   New York, 1924
 #3    Alexander Alekhine      2689 performance: 10/18 (56%) vs 2654   New York, 1924
 #4    Ernst Grünfeld      2681 performance: 8.5/11 (77%) vs 2535   Meran, 1924
 #5    Frank Marshall      2677 performance: 9/18 (50%) vs 2679   New York, 1924
 #6    Géza Maróczy      2664 performance: 9/18 (50%) vs 2665   New York, 1924
 #7    Paul Johner      2658 performance: 4/6 (67%) vs 2624   Berlin, 1924
 #8    Géza Maróczy      2648 performance: 6/7 (86%) vs 2495   Hastings, 1924
 #9    Richard Réti      2648 performance: 8.5/18 (47%) vs 2666   New York, 1924
 #10    Efim Bogoljubow      2646 performance: 8.5/18 (47%) vs 2664   New York, 1924
 #11    Max Euwe      2636 performance: 5/8 (63%) vs 2595   Colle-Euwe I (Zutphen), 1924
 #12    Rudolf Spielmann      2613 performance: 7/11 (64%) vs 2539   Meran, 1924
 #13    Akiba Rubinstein      2609 performance: 7/11 (64%) vs 2534   Meran, 1924
 #14    Akiba Rubinstein      2600 performance: 3.5/6 (58%) vs 2592   Berlin, 1924
 #15    Max Euwe      2600 performance: 5/6 (83%) vs 2464   Weston, 1924
 #16    Endre Steiner      2598 performance: 5/7 (71%) vs 2509   Hastings, 1924
 #17    Frederick Yates      2597 performance: 5.5/7 (79%) vs 2469   Hastings, 1924
 #18    Eugene Znosko-Borovsky      2586 performance: 4.5/6 (75%) vs 2488   Weston, 1924
 #19    Peter Romanovsky      2580 performance: 4/12 (33%) vs 2688   Bogoljubow-Romanovsky Match (Leningrad), 1924
 #20    Saviely Tartakower      2579 performance: 6.5/18 (36%) vs 2665   New York, 1924
NOTE: "Chessmetrics Performance Rating" is a Chessmetrics formula used to estimate the performance level of a player, based solely on the evidence of their results in one event. It only considers games against rated opposition, so the above summary excludes any games against unrated opponents.